Indistinct
Information
Habitats:


Information and
Attitudes in the
2023 Alberta
Election

August 2023

Executive Summary

Amidst concerns of rising polarization and increasing information environment segregation, the Media Ecosystem Observatory (MEO) conducted a two-pronged study during the 2023 Alberta provincial election to evaluate the possibility of increasing ideological and affective polarization. (1. 2. ) MEO’s study set out to examine the presence of distinct information environments or ‘habitats’ among Alberta New Democratic Party (NDP) and the United Conservative Party (UCP) by surveying 948 Albertans to understand their media consumption habits and collecting digital trace data on Instagram and Facebook to understand social media information networks.

Our analysis was guided by the following questions: (1) what was the news media landscape in Alberta during the election? (2) Do NDP voters and UCP supporters consume different media? (3) What attitudes are those patterns of consumption associated with?

We find that the information ecosystem is not heavily divided in terms of media consumption within the province along party lines: NDP and UCP voters do not exist in vastly different information habitats. Voters from both parties have similar news media consumption preferences and generally obtain their news from similar outlets, with the notable exceptions of CBC being favoured by NDP voters and Rebel News being favoured by UCP voters. We also find that voters from both parties use similar social media platforms.

However, the digital trace data hints at the presence of distinct information habitats on social media platforms along party lines. Using a social media engagement network from comments on candidate and media outlet posts, we find suggestive evidence that a small number of Albertans – those most heavily interested in politics – do help produce a divided social online discourse. This divergence in information environments online is an important consideration, given our study also revealed that, despite commonalities in media consumption, there are large differences in attitudes. There are large differences in attitudes related to trust in politicians and political institutions, the importance given to particular political issues, and opinions about how to best respond to the democratic threat of misinformation.

1. Affective’ polarization is the extent to which people like (or feel warmth towards) their political allies and dislike (or feel lack of warmth towards) their political opponents, see Iyengar, Sood, and Lelkes, “Affect, Not Ideology.”

2. Johnston, “Affective Polarization in the Canadian Party System, 1988–2021.”; Boyd, “‘The tale of two Albertas’: Danielle Smith’s province is already divided. Are things about to get worse?

Previous
Previous

Meta News Ban in Canada

Next
Next

Canadian Digital Media Research Network